36 Comments
User's avatar
Michael Batke's avatar

Thank you for this.

Expand full comment
Alexis's avatar

Latest report from the Guardian is that the captain was Russian as is most of the crew and the boat had been flagged before for lax safety and other problems.

Expand full comment
deSelbybigg1's avatar

I'm pretty sure Putin caused the thunderstorm here last night because the Hydrometeorological Research Center of Russia studies such things.

Expand full comment
Kenneth Newman's avatar

Well, you know what Marjorie Taylor Greene said about that! And, a Congresswoman wouldn't lie, would she?

Expand full comment
deSelbybigg1's avatar

Ha ha. Doubtful

Expand full comment
Artb3ing's avatar

W O W

Expand full comment
Kenneth Newman's avatar

Well, THAT says it all!

Expand full comment
Resident Alien's avatar

This sounds like something Russia would do. With all the shady crude shipping they do for their allies, there is probably a commercial ship captains and sailors mafia.

Expand full comment
Ann B's avatar

I almost wish Europe would just start bombing Russia snd end this war on our marine life.

Expand full comment
Ann B's avatar

Sounds good.

Expand full comment
Kenneth Newman's avatar

And what happens when 10 megaton bombs land on Paris, Berlin, and London?

Expand full comment
Ann B's avatar

Like I said, I almost wish.

Expand full comment
Kenneth Newman's avatar

OK; I'll take the "almost"!

Expand full comment
Kenneth Newman's avatar

Latest "development": According to the container ship owner, the captain is a Russian national! The plot thickens! He may have been selected at birth for this incident!

Remember what Buffalo Springfield said: Paranoia strikes deep! Into your life it will creep!

Expand full comment
areader's avatar

Deripaska

Expand full comment
Kenneth Newman's avatar

Geshuntheit!

Expand full comment
Fred. Grant's avatar

PD. Plausible Deniability.

Expand full comment
Kenneth Newman's avatar

Ok. Who is denying what?

Expand full comment
Fred. Grant's avatar

PD. Plausible Deniability.

Expand full comment
John Edgar's avatar

Thanks Julie, Good reporting. I would not doubt that Putin would have his intelligence ship jam the container ships GPS system. Hoping to make it collide with our fuel tanker ship

Expand full comment
Kenneth Newman's avatar

To be fair, the "reports" about the sodium cyanide seem all to stem from a source called Lloyds List, which in 24 hours has not been confirmed by either the LL or by any independent source. The container ship's owner released a statement saying:

"[T]hat the reports of a sodium cyanide consignment were incorrect, but that the vessel did have four empty containers that were loaded with the chemical.

“We are able to confirm that there are no containers on board ladened with sodium cyanide, as has been misreported. There are four empty containers that have previously contained the hazardous chemical and these containers will continue to be monitored,”

I now that "we're" never supposed to believe anything that an "owner" says, but the lack of follow-up by LL, which is apparently a respected maritime journalistic entity, seems to make the initial report problematic. Logically, if an evil entity wanted to destroy an oil tanker, attempting to "poison" the crew by ramming it and hoping that a few containers that may or may not even be affected by the crash is not the most efficient way.

As far as Russian "jamming" of GPS, there seems to be no indication that such jamming, while apparently used occasionally in the Baltic Sea and Ukraine, has ever been used to affect shipping near the UK. The fact that the Soviets have such capability does not necessarily mean that we should start WW3 over what seems to be negligence on the part of the container captain. After all, the US didn't declare war on Exxon when the drunken Valdez captain trashed Prince William Sound.

Expand full comment
areader's avatar

Has Manafort repaid his debt to Deripaska?

Expand full comment
Kathleen Hornyak's avatar

Thank you so much for this article and information! Very important event that get buried by all the other BS going on.

Expand full comment
Patrick Knight's avatar

Good catch and I loved the “short story buried’. Immediately brought to mind a short story buried in the New York Times I read in the physical paper years ago about a Cheney energy task force meeting where sanctioned oil was discussed as being on the table… available to be exploited. I’ve searched for it in the intervening years… And never been able to find it online.

Expand full comment
Jon Saxton's avatar

So, this narrative doesn’t nearly live up to the headline. You never get to how this collision could ‘change everything’

Expand full comment
Julie Roginsky's avatar

If this was a deliberate act of sabotage by a hostile foreign power against an American military asset, I would suggest that this changes everything. Whether this president does something about it is a different issue.

Expand full comment
DFG's avatar

I also read somewhere that the captain of the Portuguese ship was a Russian national. That may just be rumor but it wouldn’t surprise me.

Expand full comment
areader's avatar

The Cardinal of The Kremlin by Tom Clancey

Russian tactics. Russian torture tactics. Russian poison tactics.

Bone Chilling.

Expand full comment
Jon Saxton's avatar

Ha, Yes. Well, I think Trump would simply express admiration for his best-bud’s, Putin’s, manliness and smarts. And that would be what changes everything . . .

Expand full comment
Julie Roginsky's avatar

What changes everything is that we have an incident that may or may not be terrorism but if it is, we will never know, because our president is with the purported terrorist.

Expand full comment
Kenneth Newman's avatar

So in effect...nothing will change!

The alternative, since this would constitute an attack on a US vessel serving the US military, could be another "Gulf of Tonkin" resolution. Perhaps authorizing tRump to invade Greenland!

Expand full comment
Julie Roginsky's avatar

In and of itself, ignoring an attack on the United States, if proven, changes everything.

Expand full comment
Kenneth Newman's avatar

Perhaps, but absent reliable intelligence, how could it be "proven"? And if tRump doesn't want reliable intelligence information, we all know what the alleged intelligence services will produce.

As for the attack itself, what changed after the USS Cole was attacked? A

"$ million dollar missile to blow up a $100 tent"? Even if the unthinkable were to happen and tRump permitted the CIA and NSA to confirm that the incident was definitely planned and/or executed by Russia, would that mean a declaration of war?

At the very most, it could force tRump to repudiate rasPutin and make nice with Ukraine and impose "sanctions' on the Soviet empire. But I wouldn't bet anybody's bottom (or top) dollar on that!

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar

But it was a Portuguese ship that hit ours?

Expand full comment
Unholy Man's avatar

Also the flag of a ship doesn’t mean much, so it’s not quite accurate to say it’s a Portuguese ship. A ship’s flag is basically where the ship is registered or licensed for legal reasons, such as where its owners can be sued and what kind of limitations there are on its liability. Used to be that most ships were Panamanian flagged because it basically offered shipowners a free pass. Like most corporations are registered in Delaware because it’s legal and financially advantageous, not because they operate in Delaware.

Expand full comment
Julie Roginsky's avatar

Yes, a Portuguese-flagged ship owned by Germans. It was operating via GPS, which Russia has a history of jamming.

Expand full comment